Comments on: Q and a Semitic Matthew http://www.deinde.org/2007/11/12/q-and-a-semitic-matthew/ Resources for Biblical Scholars Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:06:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 By: Peter Nathan http://www.deinde.org/2007/11/12/q-and-a-semitic-matthew/#comment-6273 Peter Nathan Tue, 01 Jan 2008 22:34:29 +0000 http://www.deinde.org/2007/11/12/q-and-a-semitic-matthew/#comment-6273 See if Charles Hill of Reformed, in Florida has published anything on this. I known he has published on Papias and doesn't necessarily agree with all of Bauckham. See what you can come up with from him. I'm on the road at present. See if Charles Hill of Reformed, in Florida has published anything on this. I known he has published on Papias and doesn’t necessarily agree with all
of Bauckham. See what you can come up with from him. I’m on the road at present.

]]> By: Ken Schenck http://www.deinde.org/2007/11/12/q-and-a-semitic-matthew/#comment-3809 Ken Schenck Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:37:07 +0000 http://www.deinde.org/2007/11/12/q-and-a-semitic-matthew/#comment-3809 I'm sorry--I misread your thesis. I thought you were making the suggestion that the Matthew to which Papias referred was a version of Q, which then served as a major source for the Greek Matthew (thus the name Matthew for one of its main sources). Dale Allision suggests this also on p. 62-66, The Jesus Tradition in Q, seeing Aramaic Matthew in an early stage of Q's development... I'm sure you already knew all this. Sorry I didn't read more carefully! I’m sorry–I misread your thesis. I thought you were making the suggestion that the Matthew to which Papias referred was a version of Q, which then served as a major source for the Greek Matthew (thus the name Matthew for one of its main sources).

Dale Allision suggests this also on p. 62-66, The Jesus Tradition in Q, seeing Aramaic Matthew in an early stage of Q’s development… I’m sure you already knew all this. Sorry I didn’t read more carefully!

]]> By: Stephen C. Carlson http://www.deinde.org/2007/11/12/q-and-a-semitic-matthew/#comment-3805 Stephen C. Carlson Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:55:55 +0000 http://www.deinde.org/2007/11/12/q-and-a-semitic-matthew/#comment-3805 Danny, it sounds similar to an idea considered by Gottlob Christian Storr, Über den Zweck der evangelischen Geschichte und der Briefe Johannis (Tübingen: 1786), p. 360, n.**. Storr went on to propose, in the alternative, that the translator of Matthew knew both Mark and Luke. Danny, it sounds similar to an idea considered by Gottlob Christian Storr, Über den Zweck der evangelischen Geschichte und der Briefe Johannis (Tübingen: 1786), p. 360, n.**. Storr went on to propose, in the alternative, that the translator of Matthew knew both Mark and Luke.

]]> By: Ken Schenck http://www.deinde.org/2007/11/12/q-and-a-semitic-matthew/#comment-3804 Ken Schenck Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:42:32 +0000 http://www.deinde.org/2007/11/12/q-and-a-semitic-matthew/#comment-3804 This is my pet theory as well and I think it has somewhat of a history. As I remember, Dale Allison mentions it somewhat speculatively in his book on Q. This is my pet theory as well and I think it has somewhat of a history. As I remember, Dale Allison mentions it somewhat speculatively in his book on Q.

]]>